Radikulus

Free radiology calculators for the reading room

Enter values or choose factors to see a calculation, with comparisons drawn from published sources where applicable. Every page stays dark for the reading room.

Results

Absolute washout APWAbsolute percentage washout: 100 × (Enhanced − Delayed) / (Enhanced − Unenhanced). Decides the category when an unenhanced value is available; adenoma range ≥60% (ACR 2017).
56.7%
Relative washout RPWRelative percentage washout: 100 × (Enhanced − Delayed) / Enhanced. Decides the category only when no unenhanced value is available; adenoma range ≥40% (ACR 2017).
37.3%

Washout category

Decision order, top to bottom
StepCriterionMeaningThis lesion
W1Step 1 of this calculator’s decision order, applied top to bottom. A Radikulus step label, not an ACR category.Unenhanced ≤10 HUUnenhanced attenuation at or below 10 HU, checked first.Low unenhanced attenuationUnenhanced attenuation ≤10 HU is consistent with benign low-density features. For a homogeneous lesion, ESE recommends no further adrenal imaging; possible entities include lipid-rich adenoma, myelolipoma and a fluid-filled cyst.
W2Step 2 of this calculator’s decision order, applied top to bottom. A Radikulus step label, not an ACR category.Early and delayed enhancement <10 HULess than 10 HU change from unenhanced on the early phase, without delayed enhancement ≥10 HU.Washout not applicableNo measurable early enhancement (<10 HU change); washout is not applicable. ACR considers a mass without enhancement a cyst or hemorrhage requiring no follow-up imaging.
W3Step 3 of this calculator’s decision order, applied top to bottom. A Radikulus step label, not an ACR category.Delayed > enhancedDelayed attenuation exceeds enhanced attenuation.No washout: indeterminateNo washout: not adenoma-typical — indeterminate.
W4Step 4 of this calculator’s decision order, applied top to bottom. A Radikulus step label, not an ACR category.APW ≥60%Absolute percentage washout: 100 × (Enhanced − Delayed) / (Enhanced − Unenhanced). Decides the category when an unenhanced value is available; adenoma range ≥60% (ACR 2017).Adenoma rangeWashout at or above the adenoma threshold. ESE 2023 (PMID 37318239): evidence for accuracy of these cutoffs in adrenal incidentalomas was very low.
W5Step 5 of this calculator’s decision order, applied top to bottom. A Radikulus step label, not an ACR category.APW <60%Absolute percentage washout: 100 × (Enhanced − Delayed) / (Enhanced − Unenhanced). Decides the category when an unenhanced value is available; adenoma range ≥60% (ACR 2017).IndeterminateIndeterminate by washout criteria (absolute washout <60%).APWAbsolute percentage washout: 100 × (Enhanced − Delayed) / (Enhanced − Unenhanced). Decides the category when an unenhanced value is available; adenoma range ≥60% (ACR 2017).56.7%
  • Washout criteria apply only to homogeneous masses (ESE 2023)Washout characterization assumes a homogeneous mass. ESE 2023 advises against using washout CT to characterize nonhomogeneous lesions (Table 4).

  • 6–12-month follow-up CT may be considered (ACR 2017)When dedicated adrenal CT cannot establish a benign diagnosis, 6–12-month follow-up CT to document stability may be considered, depending on clinical context (ACR 2017).

Imaging does not determine hormonal function. See endocrine evaluation guidance (ACR 2017; ESE 2023).

WashWizard on a published case: Kwek et al. 2024, Fig. 1, PMID 38487512 (unenhanced 35, enhanced 102, delayed 64 HU; lesion 2 cm). Final diagnosis: pheochromocytoma, confirmed on pathology. Washout alone does not establish the diagnosis. This illustrates the calculation, not the reported patient’s management.

Calculators

How the calculators are built

Sources you can see
Each calculator names the guidelines or studies it uses, links to the sources and says when it was last checked for newer criteria.
Calculations and context
Results show the calculation, comparisons drawn from published sources where applicable, and relevant imaging guidance. Clinical guidance stays in the article and linked sources.
Simulate cases are labelled
Simulate loads published cases, cited by PMID, or reviewed hypothetical cases labelled as hypothetical.
Sources and calculation tests
Each calculator cites its sources. The test suite includes comparisons with a separate Python reference built from a shared specification.